AMERICAN
MOVIE CRITICS: AN ANTHOLOGY FROM THE SILENTS UNTIL NOW
Edited By PHILLIP LOPATE
Library of America; 714 Pages, $40
By DIANE GARRETT
Variety, 7/23/06

Meant
to celebrate American movie criticism, Phillip Lopate's collection
elegizes it instead. The anthology traces the devolution of film
criticism from the early days -- when top writers like Carl Sandburg
and Robert E. Sherwood debated the cultural merits of the latest
photoplays -- to today's pallid practitioners, who far too often
vie with bloggers for irrelevancy and blurb supremacy. Sad to say,
but even the so-called best presented here frequently fail to measure
up to the insight -- or verve -- of the earliest practitioners.
Lopate, a well-known essayist in his own right, opens his collection
with a chapter on the bard of Springfield, Ill., Vachel Lindsay,
who explains cinematic structure in essays with stilted titles like
"the photoplay of action" and "the artistic position
of Douglas Fairbanks." Tome soon moves on to an embarrassment
of riches from Sandburg, Sherwood, H.L. Mencken and Edmund Wilson.
Sandburg, a film critic for the Chicago Daily News in the 1920s,
enthuses that "The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari" is "the
craziest, wildest, shivery movie that has come wriggling across
the silversheet of a cinema house," while Sherwood laments
Erich Von Stroheim's extravagant shooting style. "Von Stroheim
is a genius -- 'Genius' establishes that beyond all doubt -- but
he is badly in need of a stopwatch," the noted playwright concludes.
And Mencken rants about the "maddening chaos" resulting
from editing techniques -- way back in 1927. "If I were in
a constructive mood, I'd probably propose reforms, but that mood,
I regret to say, is not on me," he writes in signature curmudgeon
fashion.
Even less-famous scribes such as Cecilia Ager, Variety's first femme
critic, display a lively wit. Ager, who first wrote about fashion
in film, is mischievous, but no less insightful for being tongue
in cheek.
The jaw-dropping names continue to pop up in the post-World War
II selection -- James Agee and Ralph Ellison jump off the page --
then all but disappear in favor of specialists as the anthology
moves to the Golden Age of Movie Criticism. According to Lopate,
that's the period from 1950 through the '70s; Stanley Kauffmann,
Andrew Sarris, Pauline Kael, Molly Haskell and novelist James Baldwin
are among the many scribes repped here.
So who are the current critics deemed worthy of inclusion? David
Denby, David Thomson and A.O. Scott are among the usual suspects,
along with Premiere's Libby Gelman-Waxner (Paul Rudnick), and John
Ashbury. Kenneth Turan's infamous "Titanic" review, which
launched a feud with helmer James Cameron, rubs salt in those wounds;
Manohla Dargis' overly precious ode to "Cat in the Hat"
also gets another airing here.
After the intoxicating early finds, these later entries can't help
but underwhelm. Doubts form: Is critical deficiency, even more than
reader disconnect, the reason so many movies are critic proof?
Yet it hardly seems fair to blame critics for that. Moviegoers choose
what they want to see, and studios certainly have no obligation
to create movies to please critics. Their increasing willingness
to forego critic screenings on high-profile films underscores how
important studios ultimately believe them to be.
So maybe critics are not as relevant as they once were, but at least
this tome reminds all that film criticism can be: funny, thought
provoking and incisive.
OTHER NEW MOVIE BOOKS YOU
MAY WANT TO CHECK OUT
THE
SUNDANCE KIDS: HOW THE MAVERICKS TOOK BACK HOLLYWOOD
PATRICIA
NEAL: AN UNQUIET LIFE
THE
MAN WHO HEARD VOICES OR, HOW M. NIGHT SHYAMALAN RISKED HIS CAREER
ON A FAIRY TALE
JUNIOR
(By Macaulay Culkin)
AVA
GARDNER
'LOVE IS NOTHING'
THE
CURSE OF VILMA VALENTINE
|