|
RED DRAGON
"Following the wanton frenzies of 'Hannibal,''
'Red Dragon' wisely returns to the wiles of impending and suggested
violence rather than the spectacle of bloody geysers. But producer
Dino De Laurentiis knows what he wants, or maybe what he thinks
we want. We want Anthony Hopkins' soft, intimate voice, burred with
mockery. We want the precise gestures, the slicked-back hair, the
slow, fluid movements interrupted by bite-the-nose-off impulses
from our old friend and his dinner guests. We get them--at the expense
of a Lecter movie that really scares or excites." -- Lisa
Schwarzbaum, Entertainment Weekly
"Lecter is such a huge presence at this point that he capsizes the
picture's narrative, which is presumably a manhunt for a serial
murderer other than Lecter...Mr. Hopkins excels at this Grand Guignol
comic relief, though it's tiresome because we've heard it before.
The entire picture is a third-generation Xerox copy...mostly the
new movie adaptation of 'Red Dragon' poses a philosophical question
not found in Mr. Harris's novels: Can something really gory put
you to sleep? 'Red Dragon" says yes.' -- Elvis
Mitchell, The New York Times
"To my surprise, [director Brett Ratner] does a sure, stylish job,
appreciating the droll humor of Lecter's predicament, creating a
depraved new villain in the Tooth Fairy (Ralph Fiennes), and using
the quiet, intense skills of Norton to create a character whose
old fears feed into his new ones...As the 'Tooth Fairy' figure,
named Francis Dolarhyde, Ralph Fiennes comes as close as possible
to creating a sympathetic monster."
-- Roger Ebert, Chicago Sun-Times
"The good news is that 'Red Dragon' is much better than the campy,
overwrought 'Hannibal' and that Anthony Hopkins' fearsome cannibal
killer is once again both evil and scary...It's frightening enough,
to be sure, but too often it feels like a well-executed but rote
exercise...the great weakness of 'Red Dragon' is a surprisingly
bland performance by the generally excellent Norton...Fortunately,
you have Fiennes' fascinating, eerily sympathetic performance..."
-- Jonathan Foreman, The New York
Post
"... a predictably efficient piece of business notable largely for
its overwhelming creepiness, for an eagerness to create images you
wish you hadn't seen, which, in this day and age, is of course the
point...There's no freshness here, no sense of newness or discovery.
In its place, there's an earnest desire not to drop the ball, a
determination to risk as little as possible in keeping this golden
egg from cracking wide open" -- Kenneth
Turan, The Los Angeles Times
|